User theme changes for 1.16

[fox]

[fox]

Well I guess I lied, I've pushed out 1.15.1 because of OPML import being broken and it has this check enabled.

[tschinz]

Well I don't really agree to that change.
If users want a different theme they should handle it. As you said it stands in red in the Themes page etc. Their fault if they don't read. But I understand your frustation on the forum, by reporting errors where there are non in tt-rss.

This change just gives more work on the guys creating a theme. If the check would be v 1.x ttrss and v 2.x ttrss I would agree, but you even control down to 1.15.3. So now every minor release I have to change one stupid line for nothing?

Anyway this won't change your opinion...

BTW: reeder theme is compatible without modif except the aforementioned line.

tschinz

[fox]

really? adding literally one fucking line to the css file: oh no its so much work for me, a Theme Developer

>So now every minor release I have to change one stupid line for nothing?

ok, don't. i honestly don't give a fuck.

[tschinz]

I understand, but better punish the user who don't contribute than people who contribute.

Anyways, I'll do it.

[JustAMacUser]

Plugin developers already have to do this and most applications (e.g. WordPress) require this type of thing anyway, so I don't view it as a big deal since it ensures a working application.

The only suggestion I would make is using version_compare() instead of strpos() so that a "minimum" version could be used, but that's a pretty minor detail.

e: Actually, further to that, implementing a theme version would be ideal. Just like the database schema and API. So only when the CSS is changed would a theme developer have to update their file(s). But that's starting to create overhead for something that's fairly inconsequential.

[fox]

version_compare would allow lazy people to just set minimum version to 0.0 or something because, as demonstrated above, updating their bespoke artisanal css files is so much effort which would just bring us all back to the starting page

>e: Actually, further to that, implementing a theme version would be ideal. Just like the database schema and API. So only when the CSS is changed would a theme developer have to update their file(s). But that's starting to create overhead for something that's fairly inconsequential.

nah I definitely don't care enough about people who desperately want my software to look like something else entirely. as far as I'm concerned if you wank over feedly UI so much just go fucking use it instead. the idea is to have third party code less likely to break my stuff, making life easier for *me*.

[naeramarth7]

[tmknight]

Shouldn't this be a sticky on the "Themes and plugins" forum? May I suggest placing it above "Question about the forum: Why are you all assholes?"?

[fox]

Sure, this makes sense.

[sleeper_service]

good idea, put it up there where nobody will read it either.